ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1aparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data of 198 cases with advanced gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the surgical approach, patients were divided into laparotomy group (n = 101) and laparoscopic group (n = 97), and the intraoperative situation, postoperative complications and quality of life were compared. Results There were no statistical differences in operation time [(226.30 ± 36.40) vs (220.50 ± 29.90) min, t = 1.23, P = 0.221)], number of lymph node cleaning [(22.01 ± 4.99) vs (20.69 ± 4.53), t = 1.95, P = 0.053] between the two groups; the blood loss of laparoscopy group was less than the laparotomy group [(114.50 ± 20.30) vs (168.30 ± 40.04) ml, t = 11.77, P = 0.000]; gastrointestinal function recovery time of laparoscopy group was less than laparotomy group [(72.30 ± 7.91) vs (84.05 ± 9.04) h, t = 9.72, P = 0.000); hospital stay of laparoscopy group was less than the laparotomy group [(8.89 ± 1.57) vs (10.36 ± 2.65) d, t = 4.72, P = 0.000]; there were no statistical differences in the tumor proximal cut end [(5.07 ± 2.04) vs (4.85 ± 1.98) cm, t = 0.77, P = 0.442) and margin of distal [(4.33 ± 1.90) vs (3.90 ± 2.02) cm, t = 1.54, P = 0.125] between the two groups; the postoperative complication rate of laparoscopy group and laparotomy group was 9.27% (9 cases ) and 7.92% (8 cases), respectively, the differencewas not statistically significance (χ2=0.01, P = 0.907); KPS score of laparoscopy group in 7 days after surgery were higher than laparotomy group [(79.33 ± 15.54) vs (73.49 ± 13.37), t = 2.84, P = 0.005], and in 30 days after surgery showed no statistical differences. Conclusion The clinical effect of 1aparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is equivalent to the laparotomy, while with less trauma. Short-term quality of life in 1aparoscopy group is higher than laparotomy group.
ABSTRACT
Se realizó un estudio con enfoque cuantitativo, de tipo observacional descriptivo, de corte transversal, con el propósito de caracterizar los costos de la realización de colecistectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital Provincial General Docente Riobamba (HPGDR), durante el año 2014. La población de estudio estuvo constituida por los documentos contables relacio-nados con esa prestación de salud en particular, los cuales estaban archivados en el Departa-mento Financiero, Centro Quirúrgico y Servicio de Cirugía. Los datos fueron recolectados mediante la técnica de la revisión de documentos, para lo cual se diseñó la respectiva guía. El importe del equipamiento resultó el más elevado dentro del rubro activos fijos tangibles con un valor de $210 923.26 USD. El análisis del valor colecistectomías laparoscópicas atendien-do al uso de trocar reutilizable y descartable mostró una diferencia de $ 434,00 USD a favor del primero de estos.
A quantitative, descriptive observational, cross-sectional study was carried out in order to characterize the costs of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the General Hospital of Riobamba (HPGDR) during 2014. The study population was constituted by the accounting documents related to that particular health benefit, which were filed in the Financial Depart-ment, Surgical Center and Surgery Service. The data was collected using the document review technique by the means of the respective guide. The amount of the equipment was the highest within the tangible fixed assets with a value of $ 210 923.26. The analysis of the value of laparoscopic cholecystectomies based on the use of reusable and disposable trocar showed a difference of $ 434.00 USD in favor of the first of these ones.